RICHARD CHARTIER, a pulsating journey into microsounds and pink noise
Human beings have an extreme curiosity and capacity to understand and dissect what pushes our limits of perception, both on the micro and macro scale. But more importantly, to create something of taking beauty in the process.
In microsound electronic music, a form of extreme minimalism, the music is taken to molecular levels where sound particles are able to be manipulated to last less than one-tenth of a second. Recent technological advancements have allowed deepening in the exploration and manipulation of these particle sounds, but composers have used theories of microsound in computer music since the 1950s, including legendaries musicians Karlheinz Stockhausen and Iannis Xenakis.
Heir of these pioneers, American sound and installation artist Richard Chartier is one of the current biggest exponents of microsound. Even though he doesn’t consider himself a musician or a composer in the classical sense – he’s not musically trained and he doesn’t take into play musical theories when creating sound pieces-, his compositions are brutal minimalistic poetic musical statements. In our conversation he shares his early love for machines sound, particularly that of a buzzing refrigerator in the house he grew up; one cannot escape the poetic minimalism of domestic concrete sounds.
Chartier’s body or work is beyond prolific, in all manner of configurations. Only to start with his solo work, that has seen him published in labels including Lawrence English’s Room40, Touch, Editions Mego, Raster-Noton and his own label LINE, to prolific collaborations with fellow musicians and artists such as Lawrence English, William Basinski, Yann Novak, Evelina Domnitch and France Jobin -among a myriad more- is with the latest with whom he’s released his most recent album, DUO (mAtter, 2018). A pulsating journey into deeply reflective mental and vibratory physical spaces. Jobin and Chartier will premiere an AV show of DUO, with visuals by Markus Heckman, at Mutek Montreal this August 2019.
In the last few years, Chartier has also been putting more focus on another of his projects, Pinkcourtesyphone, a project that allows the artist to express a more emotional side of his work, often reflecting on queerness and gender. Chartier started Pinkcourtesyphone as a demo he planned on sending to Leyland Kirby (aka The Caretaker) for his VVM label in 1997, but the project has profoundly matured and evolved during the years. Pinkcourtesyphone takes inspiration from cinema, where the music and the album and track names are infused with a whiff of cinematographic melancholia and quirkiness, partly influenced by Chartier’s move to LA.
We can’t help wonder about the pink, which, besides the more obvious queer connotations, it also refers to pink noise, the artist confirms. Pink noise is the type of noise most common in biological systems (heartbeat rhythms, neural activity and even DNA sequences), a wink to this more emotional side of the project.
Chartier is these days, also a pivotal figure in the experimental art scene in LA, where he contributes with his compositions, installations and curational work to a thriving and extremely creative and honest community. Chartier will be releasing later in the year Variations in the idea of Completion on Ash International the imprint of Touch’s Mike Harding.
Words by Meritxell Rosell (Twitter @dancingmoog)
You are an artist and composer considered one of the key figures in minimalist and reductionist sound art. For our audience that is not familiar with your work, how and when the interest in sound come about?
I have always been very interested in sound(s)… as a child, I was a very good mimic of sounds and noises around me. I really loved the sounds of machines. I have told this story before, but, in the house I grew up in, the kitchen table was right next to the refrigerator and I used to put my ear against it and listen. I loved the sounds it made, sometimes intense and vibrational, sometimes, tiny and distant.
After a reviewer derided an early work of mine by writing “my fridge could have made this album” I actually took that as a compliment.
These types of sounds just set off something in my mind.
Artists like Zoviet France, Hafler Trio, Pan Sonic were key in how I re-approached listening at different stages in my life.
I was just listening to a piece by AGF yesterday, that incorporates radio waves, and I was instantly transported back to our basement growing up. We had a big 1930s radio from my grandparents home that I loved to play with. I really enjoyed the areas between these AM and short wave stations. I think that says a lot.
Pinkcourtesyphone is one of your projects that -you share- has become a very important part of your work since the last few years. A space for a more emotional and “musical” side of your work. You started the project in 1997, how has Pinkcourtesyphone evolved throughout the years?
Pinkcourtesyphone started as a demo I planned on sending to Leyland Kirby for his VVM label in 1997. For some reason, I didn’t and it just kind of sat there until I dug it back out and started reworking it (+loops, sound files from that project) as the basis for the first album ‘Foley Folly Folio’ in 2012.
Pinkcourtesyphone deals with a lot of my sonic and visual obsessions growing up which may not relate to my work under my own name.
I expected to do the one album and almost released without acknowledging I was the artist behind it. It got positive feedback and reviews, which overwhelmed me. I really enjoyed making the first album and then I got asked for a second album by Lawrence English for his label Room40.
It’s a very different way for me to work, it’s much more intuitive and has a sense of freedom. I have enjoyed working with other live musicians and vocalists. They have brought a different sensibility to it.
Pinkcourtesyphone is a more open pathway for me, it can shift and be anything.
Your most recent release is DUO, an album in collaboration with France Jobin. Could you tell us how was the intellectual and creative process behind the album? Is it an experimental work or did you compose the pieces?
The initial piece began as a composition I was unsure of, it felt like a dead end. I thought it might be a good starting point to work again with Eleh. He was rather busy at the time and I reached out to my friend France. I have known her since the first Mutek in Montreal. She and I had been wanting to do something together, and I sent it to her, asking her sheepishly if she thought it was worth continuing. She said “Mais oui!”
We started tearing it apart and rebuilding it from the ground up. I like working in this way. Something that began as its foundation, slowing dematerialized over the course of the collaboration.
I am so happy that France and I got to create DUO together. The successful kind of collaboration, at least to me, is when you, as one of the artists cannot tell who did what or how you arrived at that point. When everything just meshes.
France and I are both hyper-detailed-composers.
I have to say that the mastering that Stephan Mathieu did for DUO and its subsequent pressing on vinyl on mAtter, Japan, is just stunning. I was unsure how these pieces would come out on such an exceedingly temperamental medium, but WOW… it’s one of the nicest pressings.
I am so proud of the whole project. And its makes me happy that I was able to work with such a close friend on this. It was a long time coming.
Collaborations are at the core of your practice. How do you approach these? what are the challenges you may have encountered?
With collaborations, I like to know the person/artist. It’s not something that I would ever approach randomly. My process can be very slow and tedious.. but with collaborations, they can speed up and be a whirlwind (then you know the “magic” is happening).
Each collaboration is different and I feel they only work when you approach the other half as equal, there can be no subversion, or overpowering… how can these two halves become one?
The best collaborations, in my opinion, is when you (and the listener) can no longer make out who is doing or who decided what within a composition. I also find them successful if I go back and listen and cannot remember making it. The process fades away and becomes a mystery again.
You are also a graphic designer and visual artist. The Pinkcourtesyphone releases feel very cinematographic (very evocative of David Lynch, John Waters and the likes), and some your albums with your Richard Chartier moniker are inspired by the work of visual artists and their imagery; in what way visual art and images inform and impact your musical/sound practice?
I don’t think it has anything to do with John Waters (although I love his work)… it’s more linked to film-makers like Rainer Werner Fassbinder and Douglas Sirk… and a lot of B movies.
I am not really a visual artist anymore. I was trained as a painter but that process no longer makes much sense to me. It’s not a medium I can communicate through.
I am still inspired by colour, texture, arrangement. I think very visually when composing.
Pinkcourtesyphone, in particular, is highly inspired by cinema (and dreams).
From a more technical aspect of your creative process, what is your relationship with technology nowadays?
Making something beautiful and evocative with the least means. I am not interested in the latest gear and plugins. I use what I use only because it makes sense to me, fits my approach.
Its not the technology that makes an artist’s work substantive.
Your label LINE it’s dedicated to curating digital minimalism. How is the work of a curator into music selection and how is your personal relationship with the “curator” word?
LINE has evolved over the past 18 years and 106 releases, I release works that I really enjoy. They can be outside of the traditional concept of what is minimal. It certainly doesn’t have to be digital.
The word curator is highly overused now. Everything is “curated”… “a curated selection of artisanal raisins” etc. I am not sure how I feel about this term anymore. Words have meaning… but some words just become diluted and annoying in context.
And what direction do you want to keep for LINE in the future? Are there any territories you’d like to explore?
There is no specified path for LINE. There is, of course, a trajectory over time, in a historical sense… but that does not mean it cannot change. Its all about what I hear and what moves me.
Labels, in general, are facing an uphill battle.
With your work with LINE, you have frequently engaged with artists working in different disciplines, some of them using scientific concepts and methodology. Has having a scientific input changed the way you approach your curational (or even sound) practice?
I don’t think it has changed my approach. I don’t think of LINE as purely academic or scientific.
Your chief enemy of creativity? (And what’s your secret to being so massively prolific?
Time, money and fear.
Creativity takes times. An artist should review, reflect, edit, and reassess.
I do not trust artists who think everything they do or have done is a masterpiece. A star mentality is not indicative of creativity or originality.
In regards to being prolific, some years are just busier than others. It all depends on where my mind is. I cannot force myself to create work. Forced creativity is a capitalist trap, and to be honest capitalism (money) is the chief enemy of creativity. It’s now just exploitative.
The enemy to all creativity is competition. Creativity is not a war, creativity is collaboration.
You could not live without…
music, beauty, love, and honesty.